1. Editorial Principles & Accuracy
Our guides, reviews and psychological insights are researched and reviewed by contributors with backgrounds in technology, psychology and digital communication. Every factual claim about mental wellness or AI capability is checked against reliable primary sources before publication. We write for people first โ clarity over keyword volume โ and we never publish content we would not want a close friend to read.
2. Transparency in AI Assistance
We may use AI tools to assist with research, outlining and drafting. However, every published article undergoes substantive human editorial review, fact-checking and original restructuring. AI never decides what we cover, which conclusions we draw, or how we characterise evidence โ humans do. Where an article discusses AI behaviour, we verify claims against the systems themselves rather than repeating vendor marketing.
3. Sourcing & Fact-Checking
- Statistics and studies are linked to their original source wherever one exists.
- Expert quotations are attributed by name and role; unverified โexpertโ claims are removed.
- Product comparisons are based on hands-on evaluation or clearly cited documentation.
- When evidence is mixed or preliminary, we say so explicitly instead of overstating certainty.
4. Independence & Advertising Separation
Editorial decisions are made independently of advertising. Ad placements are visually distinct from articles, no advertiser can influence rankings or conclusions, and we do not publish paid posts disguised as reviews. If that ever changes, disclosure will appear at the top of the affected article.
5. Sensitive-Topic Guardrails
- Mental-health safety: we clearly distinguish AI companionship from clinical treatment and include crisis-resource guidance where appropriate.
- No harmful advice: we never publish content encouraging isolation, self-harm or abusive dynamics.
- Honest reviews: comparisons evaluate genuine features; weaknesses are stated, not buried.
6. Corrections & Feedback
Spotted an error? Email editorial@kruthika.fun. Verified inaccuracies are corrected promptly with the change noted on the article (updated date), and significant corrections are flagged visibly rather than silently edited. General feedback is always welcome.